Learning From MAXI Excellence
February 26, 2014 - by By Stephen Godbout
It’s MAXI Season and time to start looking at the winners, which can be as simple as a postcard … or just the right combination of message and integration … or an astounding 21,500,000 email campaign with a mere 0.14% unsubscribe rate.
That’s what we learned last Thursday at DMAW’s “Case Studies from MAXI Award Winners” Lunch and Learn. In case you missed it, here’s a recap.
First up: The PETA Postcard Acquisition presented by Steve Kerli, PETA’s Development Director
PETA was faced with a dilemma. How to convert the growing list of new names of people coming in from their website after taking an action on one of their many campaigns, which in December was over 80,000 new names from just one campaign?
To convert these potential donors using their control acquisition mailing—an oversized, flat rate national survey package—was simply cost prohibitive for keeping up with these donors while the names were still hot. So they came up with a single issue-based postcard which could be preprinted, and mailed weekly as a follow-up once a potential donor had taken an action.
It contains a direct and clear call to action, no fluff that might confuse the donor, a sense of urgency, and a deadline. The postcard drove donors online, and once there, the online petition drove donations.
The results prove that Keeping in Simple St*#%d really works with 5.15% of recipients taking an action, and an incredible 1.95% response rate for donations from a conversion acquisition mailing that can keep up with the Internet.
Next: Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Pigs and Goats Integrated Mix presented by Lesley Hostetter, Account Supervisor and Director of Integrated Marketing at Lautman Maska Neill & Company
PCRM’s entry proves a winning combination of a powerful message with careful integrated marketing can bring home the gold.
This appeal was based PCRM’s efforts to get the U.S. Air Force to stop using pigs and goats in their combat trauma training exercises—which involved extremely gruesome details that needed to be related to the donor. Here Lesley mentioned the importance of keeping letters, and emails, personal, one on one style writing, person to person. The letter included a paragraph that was preceded with, “Here are the gruesome details: (If you’d rather not read them please skip to the next paragraph).
Now some of you want to know the gruesome details, don’t you?
Let’s just say 6,000 animals were being brutally killed each year, and the details would make you want to sign the petition, which was another part of the package that Lesley emphasized as a way to get the donor more personally involved in the mission of the organization. The petition was accompanied with highlighted stickers showing the donor where to sign, which bumped response rate by nearly 50% and net revenue by 60%.
In addition to the direct mail piece a coordinated email was sent out with matching imagery and concise, condensed messaging asking the recipient to sign a petition, after which, the donor was directed to a donation page. For those who did not give after signing the online petition a follow up email was sent asking for them to make a donation.
Results: More than 3,700 donors responded (9%) raising $137,000. 15% of donors responded to the email components of the campaign, with one segment of the follow up email obtaining a phenomenal 50% open rate. Best of all, the petitions helped drive results for animals too, as Congress eventually passed a bill holding the military accountable – and required them to create a plan for eliminating animal use once and for all.
Last, but certainly not smallest: People For the American Way’s 21 + Million Email Campaign, presented by Damien Shirley, Account Executive Chapman Cubine Adams + Hussey
How do you send out 21,500,000 emails, and keep your campaign fresh?
Damien explains that PFAW’s three month campaign, involving 55,000 messages revolved around the 2012 elections, during which the organization established itself as a go-to source of election related news and information.
Some of the tactics he discussed were aggressive scheduling. In addition to designated appeals and renewals during the campaign, PFAW integrated campaign messaging into other donor touch points such as newsletters, action alerts, etc.
Damien also noted that PFAW’s email list had been primed to receive a lot of messages, they had tested into lists which were likely to be most responsive and stay engaged throughout the entire campaign.
To keep it fresh, PFAW utilized breaking news, election/polling developments, controversies that arose during the election, debates, and they made sure to always tie messages back to PFAW’s work to hold elected officials accountable and elect progressive candidates.
They also took advantage of a variety of senders, including celebrity board members and politicians, as well as various people involved directly in the campaign from field organizers to political directors. When asking for a donation, they clearly demonstrated how the donor’s gift will make a difference. One example Damien gave was when PFAW informed their donors that Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS had just made a series of ad buys in Spanish speaking markets in key swing states, and PFAW was already on the air in those markets—so a donation now could help counter this threat to progressive candidates.
PFAW also used “Did you see this?” type lift notes to resend the most effective emails, or the ones they believed would have the longest reach.
Results:
Approximately 21,500,000 total emails raised nearly $640,000 accounting for more than 80% of PFAW’s online income during that 3-month period. And it was 130% higher than revenue raised during their last election campaign, with nearly a quarter of donors giving multiple gifts. Plus, amazingly, no demonstrable list fatigue.
___________________________________________________________________________
Stephen Godbout is a freelance copywriter with thirteen years direct marketing experience. He can be reached at stephen@copybygod.com.
Industry Articles
July 2022
March 2021
When a Woman Is “The First,” Can She Also Be “The Best”?
June 2020
Recurring Gifts — If You Don't Ask, You Won't Recieve
March 2020
DMAW WEBINAR: Fundraising in the Middle of a Pandemic
June 2018
We entered muggles. We left magicians.
June 2018
The Magic Your Organization Needs
April 2018
5 Sure-fire Ways to Increase Response Rates
September 2017
Red, Blue or Indifferent: The Election Changed Fundraising
July 2017
It’s July: Do You Know Where Your 2018 Direct Response Budget Is?
June 2017
7 Ideas For Multi-Channel Break-Throughs
November 2016
8 Years of Uncertainty is Enough
September 2016
Direct Mail Premiums: Pros and Cons From a Former Pro
August 2016
July 2016
Podcast on On Direct Response Fundraising – with guest Lisa Maska
June 2016
Giving USA: 2015 Was America’s Most-Generous Year Ever
May 2016
Philanthropy: Make Your Mother Proud
July 2015
Fundriaisng Day in New York City
June 2015
April 2015
Taget Analytics | donorCentrics™ Index of Direct Marketing Fundraising 2014 Results
March 2015
Communication is Key to Saving Money
February 2015
The 2014 Charitable Giving Report
February 2015
Obama Budget Again Calls for Limit to Charitable Deduction
November 2014
Charitable Giving: How to evaluate and support good causes
November 2014
September 2014
The Science Of A Donor Acquisition Package
July 2014
Consider the Environment. Print this.
July 2014
"Pink Slips" Win Big At MAXI Awards
June 2014
May 2014
Education Opportunities for Non-Profit Executives
March 2014
Member Spotlight: Emerging Leader
September 2013
30 Brilliant Bits of Online Fundraising Wisdom from the Experts
August 2013
Building a Stronger Bridge: Conference Volunteer, Tiffany Neill Looks Ahead
June 2013
Non-Profit Fundraising and Marketing in a Multi-Channel World
June 2013
Invest in Marketing and Fundraising to Encourage Innovation
November 2012